Altered bylaw limits funded
ASUA to refuse money to groups too politically, religiously extreme
By: Shain Bergan
Issue date: 9/18/07 Section: News
|
Hosted by the UA Priority College Ministry, the concert had received ASUA support each of the last seven years.
The modification of Article X, Section E of the ASUA bylaws states that the organization may not fund any events with an excessively political or overtly religious lean, a description that includes the concert, said Tommy Bruce, ASUA president.
"We are just following suit based on required policies by the university," he said. "We have to follow them."
Said ASUA senator Amy Drapkin: "It was out of our hands. It really was a black-and-white issue."
With a more specific policy in place, the resulting effects on funding other organizations will not fully be known until ASUA hears their motions for events, she added.
"We're going to deal with this on a case-by-case basis," Drapkin said. "We have to be careful about what we do with government funding."
The concert funding was originally sent to the Senate for a vote, where it was defeated.
The denial left PCM looking elsewhere for money for the concert, scheduled for last Friday, said PCM president Tim Salomon, a psychology junior.
"We really didn't have much time to respond. We had to get funding immediately," Salomon said. "Luckily, we received a lot of donations from some local churches, so the concert went on as planned."
Salomon said he does not blame ASUA or anyone individually for the decision, but that all he wants is clarification and confirmation.
After the original bylaw was found to be too broad and open to interpretation, ASUA decided that it would eventually have to be changed, Bruce said. The bylaw adjustment had been discussed within ASUA previously, but took priority after funding for the PCM concert went on the table. ASUA was pressed for time to interpret the bylaw change in order to set precedent for future contributions to clubs, said Jessica Anderson, ASUA executive
vice president.
Although he believes ASUA should review the decision, Salomon said the situation has opened his eyes to the future of PCM.
"I personally see this as a blessing. This can teach us how to be more independent and less dependent on ASUA," he said. "This just confirms that we should be more reliable on outside sources."
The decision was about policy and procedure and had nothing to do with bias or prejudice, Bruce said.
"We would never intentionally discriminate against any religion or organization," he said.
A clause in the bylaw states that funding may be given to religious events if they are open to the entire university and would benefit the UA community as a whole, criteria the PCM concert did not meet, Drapkin said.
"(PCM) expressed that the concert was open to those wanting to worship Jesus Christ," Drapkin said. "That doesn't include everybody and therefore would not have benefited the university."
Policy on posting: The Arizona Daily Wildcat would like to offer readers an opportunity to voice their opinions and engage in community conversation. However, readers should refrain from personal attacks or advertisements in their comments. When a reader chooses to participate in the Wilcat's online comments, they should be aware that all comments and postings do not reflect the views of the publication. Links referencing different sources for the sake of discussion are tolerated and encouraged, but comments and links that are posted only to advertise other sites will be deleted at the discretion of the Wildcat.
Viewing Comments 1 - 4 of 6
Garrett P. O'Hara
posted 9/18/07 @ 4:22 AM MST
The Pride Alliance is open to those wanting to affirm the LGBT community. That doesn't include everybody and therefore does not benefit the university. (Continued…)
K.E.
posted 9/18/07 @ 9:32 AM MST
It sounds like there are constitutional issues here. Will this be appealed to the ASUA Supreme Court?
Dustin Cox
posted 9/18/07 @ 2:41 PM MST
I find it unfortunate that Shain Bergan wrote such an inaccurate article regarding ASUA's actions concerning the funding of religious events. While not knowing what the Appropriations Board's correct name is is probably inexcusable in itself, it is not the most important critique that I have for the article – although it apparently is representative of his "fact-finding" prowess. (Continued…)
Ryan Christofilakas
posted 9/19/07 @ 2:46 AM MST
This is in response to Dustin Cox's comments about the article.
To Mr. Cox: First off, I find it funny that you criticize the Wildcat Reporter for inaccuracies, yet your own comments are riddled with them. (Continued…)
Post a Comment