Prof. disputes degree merger

Sternberg claims engineering department lacks justification for eliminating undergraduate program

By: Yusra Tekbali

Issue date: 3/4/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
Ben K. Sternberg, a geological and mining engineering professor, expresses his opposition with the Faculty Senate's decision to eliminate the geological engineering program at the Senate's meeting yesterday afternoon.
Media Credit: Jacob Rader
Ben K. Sternberg, a geological and mining engineering professor, expresses his opposition with the Faculty Senate's decision to eliminate the geological engineering program at the Senate's meeting yesterday afternoon.

The Faculty Senate approved a measure to eliminate the undergraduate geological engineering program in the College of Engineering yesterday, despite one professor's attempt to convince senators otherwise.

The College of Engineering proposed to merge the undergraduate degrees in mining engineering and geological engineering into a single Bachelor of Science degree called Mining and Geological Engineering in a proposal submitted to the Senate by Mary Poulton, head of the mining and geological engineering department, and Jeff Goldberg, the college's associate dean.

Budget cuts, loss of faculty and staff lines as well as the small enrollment in the program were the main reasons cited for the merge, according to the Senate agenda.

"The department and college resources can be used more wisely if they were consolidated," said Thomas Peterson, dean of the College of Engineering.

The new major would have a mining engineering track and a geological engineering track in an effort to eliminate the excess resources devoted to maintaining accreditation and funding for two separate yet very similar degrees, he said.

Ben Sternberg, a mining and geological engineering professor, said the college didn't follow the correct process for disestablishing the geological engineering program, of which he's been a part for more than two decades, and challenged the department's justification for doing so.

President Robert Shelton said he supported the college's decision because it was a more efficient and fiscally responsible alternative.

"If you can have fewer administrative folks between the two programs, yet offer the same number of degrees, then that is best," Shelton said.

Sternberg disagreed.

"You can make a financial argument to eliminate anything," he said. "The program is valuable and they're eliminating it with very limited discussion of the matter."
Page 1 of 3 next >

Article Tools

Policy on posting: The Arizona Daily Wildcat would like to offer readers an opportunity to voice their opinions and engage in community conversation. However, readers should refrain from personal attacks or advertisements in their comments. When a reader chooses to participate in the Wilcat's online comments, they should be aware that all comments and postings do not reflect the views of the publication. Links referencing different sources for the sake of discussion are tolerated and encouraged, but comments and links that are posted only to advertise other sites will be deleted at the discretion of the Wildcat.

Viewing Comments 1 - 3 of 3

Tim Wallace

posted 5/09/08 @ 12:27 PM MST

travesty. absolutely tragic.

Robert Cook

posted 5/09/08 @ 12:29 PM MST

I concur with my associate Mr. Wallace. This is a truly devastating event. This saddens me deeply.

Michal Romanowski

posted 5/09/08 @ 12:32 PM MST

Mining Kills! A baby is killed everytime an open pit collapses. Who is gonna fix this? Mining engineer? I think not. Coin flip at best.

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.


Advertisement

Poll

Do you ever respond to these poll questions?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement